Quantifying the impact of design review methods on NPD

Survey results from 250 global engineering leaders

Survey completed by Global Surveyz

What's in the report?

Key Findings

  • Late stage design errors are a significant driver of delayed product launches
  • Design review quality rated as the #1 most important factor impacting an engineering team’s ability to deliver projects on time
  • Most teams still struggle with 3 key gaps in their approach to design review

What's slipping through the cracks?

Teams need better ways to document and track design feedback.

On average, engineering teams capture and resolve 57.2% of feedback generated during design reviews. The other 42.8% is lost, leading to product quality issues downstream.

42.8% of feedback is never documented

Engineering roles we surveyed


  • United States
  • United Kingdom
  • Germany
  • France
  • Belgium
  • Switzerland
  • The Netherlands


  • Consumer hardware
  • Heavy machinery
  • Industrial equipment/
  • Automotive

Job Seniority

  • VP / Head
  • Director
  • Manager
  • C-suite

Access the full dataset

Discover how other engineering teams run their design reviews and what 250 technical leaders rated as the top areas for improvement.

We store and process the data in this form to respond to your request. For more information on how we use data, please refer to our Privacy Policy.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.